Tempo de leitura: menos de 1 minuto
That might be a nice thing to do, but it isnt something others can force you to do. I think he takes it that the elite would also choose the just society, because part of the magic of the veil of ignorance is that it asks them not "would a given social arrangement help you?" Behind the Veil, we are not individuals, and so any decision we reach is meaningless. Do you agree? Have I extricated myself from a church to find myself confined in another? One problem with this argument, to which Rawls might appeal, is that my ability to work (and therefore gain property) depends on many other things: So its not quite true that everything I produce comes from me alone. John Rawls (1999) A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, Robert Nozick (1974) Anarchy, State and Utopia Blackwell Publishing (Oxford) pp.149-232, Charles Taylor (1989) Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity Cambridge: CUP, Michael Walzer (1983) Spheres of Justice Oxford: Blackwell. For example, the minimum wage makes it more difficult for unskilled people to get jobs in which they might learn skills. The Veil is meant to ensure that peoples concern for their personal benefit could translate into a set of arrangements that were fair for everyone, assuming that they had to stick to those choices once the Veil of Ignorance lifts, and they are given full information again. Problems with Rawl's Theory Now I feel that someone at least knows what's going on here - as so few people read this question, it made me wonder if people knew who Rawls was. Why does the narrative change back and forth between "Isabella" and "Mrs. John Knightley" to refer to Emma's sister? Even if the details face problems, Rawlss Veil of Ignorance shows us that it can be valuable to imagine things from opposing points of view. This ignores, purposefully, the many injustices that have happened and continue to happen, including the fact that most societies continue to exhibit racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination. Even a pessimistic conclusion on this issue, though, should recognise the following insight from Rawls: that what seems just or fair or right to any person is influenced not just by our background but by our own selfish interests.
Fill In The Blank Poems For Adults,
Bone Spicules After Tooth Extraction,
Articles P
pros and cons of the veil of ignorance